Skip navigation

Gloucestershire Business News

Employment Law Update - Covid-19: Nigel Tillott, Davies and Partners

Confused after last night's announcement? From an employment perspective the big question is whether people are allowed to attend their workplaces if the work cannot be done from home.

There was confusion about whether one could only attend a workplace if it was an essential service or if it was absolutely necessary to go to work in order to carry out the work function. It appears the answer is the latter.

The Government initially said "travelling to and from work [is permitted] but only where it is absolutely necessary and cannot be done from home".

This wasn't at all clear. It then published guidance saying "travelling to and from work [is permitted] but only where this absolutely cannot be done from home".

Subsequently, Andy Burnham tweeted that he had clarification from the Government and that was to the effect that people "CAN leave home to work as long as they fully observe the 2 metre distance rule". On that basis anyone can go to work provided the work cannot be done from home.

For employers maximum flexibility is important e.g. avoid commute times if public transport is required.

Of course, this is a fast moving piece and will change rapidly.

It also looks like there are proposals to guarantee a minimum income for the self-employed. These are not passed yet.

We are still awaiting clarity in relation to Furlough working and this would be extremely welcome!

Furlough Leave

Prior to Friday did you know the word 'Furlough'? I must confess that I have been an employment lawyer for over 30 years, and it wasn't a word that I was familiar with.

As you will undoubtedly have heard, the Government has introduced a scheme whereby if an employee is laid off i.e. kept on the book but not given work, it will pay 80 per cent of wage costs up to £2,500 currently for a 3-month period, but potentially to be extended.

So far those are the headlines, the detail isn't there as yet. This will be relevant to an awful lot of employers in the private sector and the detail will be much needed. For now, the following may assist: -

It is not entirely clear, but the payment would appear to be a maximum payment of £2,500 per month, so this would mean an employee normally paid just over £3,120 per month would get paid 80 per cent of full pay. An employee who earned more than that would get a capped amount of £2,500.

• Unless there is a contractual right to lay-off - which some but only a minority of employers have - the Furlough leave needs to be agreed. However, in the current crisis we have, it is hard to conceive that employees will reject the opportunity of Furlough leave.

• It doesn't appear as if employers will have to top up to 100 per cent, although some unions are pressing for this. The reality is that most employers using this measure will be in a difficult situation and will want to be seeking to prioritise payments to those who remain working and therefore topping up those that aren't working is not likely to be a viable or indeed sensible option.

• Applications will need to be made via an HMRC on-line portal. To date it is not set up. It is planned to have it in place by the end of April but then to have payments backdated to the start of the month.

For those sectors where they have been closed down this scheme will be invaluable. Others will need to use it too. However, when Government looks at the detail, I would strongly ask that it considers a refined and nuanced scheme.

At present a lot of employers still require employees to work, but the work is gradually slowing down. Also, employers have concerns about customers' ability to pay. Loans are only a partial solution. There are already many scenarios where an employer will need an employee to work and cannot afford full pay. It may propose reduced hours.

The challenge is getting the 'key' employees to provide necessary input if they may be receiving the same or even less pay than those who have been placed on Furlough leave. Subsidies allowing employers to keep employees at work on reduced pay seem to be a key part of the jigsaw.

Further, it would be helpful if the payments will apply to relatively short periods of Furlough leave enabling employers to share around remaining work.

Watch this space!

Please go to our website for further information about Davies and Partners Solicitors.

Nigel Tillott , is head of employment and regulatory law at Davies and Partners Solicitors 

DDI: 01452 689100

Related Articles

Financial planners' booklet to help people put affairs in order - Huw Jones of Proposito Image

Financial planners' booklet to help people put affairs in order - Huw Jones of Proposito

To help people plan for after their death, financial planners Proposito have created a handy booklet to enable vital information to be stored in one place.

Are all sales opportunities good business for you? - Jonathan Viney of JV Consultancy Group Image

Are all sales opportunities good business for you? - Jonathan Viney of JV Consultancy Group

In a time when you may feel that you need turnover, I would suggest that you review potential sales that do not fit the normal profile of what you do. If this happens, what do you do?

How Hearing tests went bananas - Tom Parker of WorkScreen Image

How Hearing tests went bananas - Tom Parker of WorkScreen

Until coronavirus got on its plane from.... wherever, the expectations around ensuring staff are safe at work was pretty simple.

Can I still see my children on Father's Day? - Kristie Rhodes of WSP Solicitors Image

Can I still see my children on Father's Day? - Kristie Rhodes of WSP Solicitors

With more than 2.9 million separated families in the UK in 2019, it is unsurprising that many people seek legal advice about spending time with their child on special occasions throughout the year.

Copyright 2020 Moose Partnership Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any content is strictly forbidden without prior permission.