Fears that extra homes will swamp city site
By Bethany Winter | 30th April 2018
Councillors have attacked plans to increase the number of new homes proposed for a Gloucester site.
A scheme has been submitted to build 100 homes on the grounds of the former Civil Service club in Kingsholm.
Liberal Democrat councillors are opposed to so many properties being built on the Estcourt Road site, saying it will take away valuable green space for local people.
The application by Redrow Homes to Gloucester City Council is an increase of 11 properties on a previous application of 89 homes, which is yet to be determined by the Planning committee.
Councillor Jeremy Hilton, who represents Kingsholm Ward on the city council, claimed the new application was in contravention of several council polices.
"The area has less public open space than the council says is necessary for the local population," said Councillor Hilton. "This application will take away valuable green space in the heart of Kingsholm. We do need more houses, but not so many at this location.
"The council's draft city plan says the maximum on the site should be 20. This would leave the large field untouched and available for sport and recreation.
"Sport England raised objections to the previous application of 89 houses I imagine they will do the same for 100 dwellings."
Councillor Isabel Brazil, who also represents Kingsholm Ward, said: "We need to protect the green spaces in Kingsholm. There just isn't enough locally, especially public open space.
"We are supporting plans for new housing on London Road and off Great Western Road, but the maximum permitted at Civil Service Club must be 20."
Redrow Homes purchased the site in 2011, following which all buildings have been demolished on the site which has now been vacant for over six years.
In its application to the council, agents on behalf of Redrow Homes say: "This application seeks to redevelop the site for much needed new homes, including affordable homes in line with the council's policy requirements.
"It will also meet other required S106 obligations including to support local school place provision for example, as well as providing the council with their required financial contribution to provide a significant investment in to off-site playing pitch/sports provision in the city for new residents and in mitigation for the loss of the former facilities."
Pictured: Councillors Jeremy Hilton and Isabel Brazil
Related Articles
Copyright 2024 Moose Partnership Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduction of any content is strictly forbidden without prior permission.